This article
deals with the most notable naval “last stands” of the Napoleonic era.
In an earlier
blog article we encountered the innovative sloop, HMS Dart, when she went into attack on the heavily defended French base
at Dunkirk in 1800 (Click here for this article). The Dart and her sister HMS Arrow,
were experimental vessels, never indeed to be repeated. They were the
brain-child of Sir Samuel Bentham (1757 – 1831) – brother of the philosopher
Jeremy Bentham. At this stage in a remarkable career as an engineer and naval
architect, in Britain, Russia and China, Sir Samuel held the position of
Inspector General of Naval Works. These two vessels were virtually double-ended
and featured a large breadth-to-length ratio, structural bulkheads, and sliding
keels. Of 150 tons and a mere 80 feet long overall, they packed an enormous
punch for their size, all guns being carronades, twenty-four 32-pounders on the
upper deck, two 32 pounders on the forecastle and another two on the
quarterdeck.
Close up of HMS Arrow - detail from larger painting shown below |
The second of
the sister-vessels, HMS Arrow, left
Malta in January 1805, under the command of Commander Richard Vincent (1770–1831),
to escort a British convoy of 34 merchant vessels headed westwards out of the
Mediterranean. Accompanying her, as the only other escort, was HMS Acheron, commanded by Commander Arthur
Farquhar (1772 – 1843). The latter was somewhat of an unusual choice, as she
was a bomb vessel, a 388-ton, 108-foot merchant ship that had been converted to
carry a 10-inch mortar and a massive 13-inch weapon for shore bombardment.
Though these mortars was unsuited to ship-to-ship action, Acheron did however carry a heavy close-range armament of eight
24-pounder carronades. Once again, as we see in so many accounts of actions in this
era, the carronade was to provide notably strong gun-power to a small
vessel.
The convoy
had passed out into the Atlantic through the Straits of Gibraltar when on the
morning of 3rd February two large vessels were seen coming up fast
from astern. These were initially thought to be laggards from the convoy but as
they closed they were perceived to be most likely warships. Commander Vincent
on the Arrow accordingly signalled to
Acheron to investigate. The strangers
proved to be powerful 40-gun French frigates, later to be identified as the Hortense and the Incorruptible. Neither Arrow
nor Acheron could be considered a
fair match for either. A stern chase developed and continued through the day
but by nightfall it was obvious that there would be no way of escaping. The
options were to fight or to surrender. Commander Vincent chose to fight.
French frigate Incorruptible |
It appears
that Vincent had previously made an agreement with the captains of the larger
merchant ships in the convoy that carried guns to form a line of battle in such
circumstance. He now called on them to do so but according to one account “these gentlemen were of the opinion that
discretion was the better part of valour… they did not even answer the signal.”
Darkness had
now fallen, so too the wind, and no contact were made with the enemy during the
night. A breeze sprung up with first light the following morning however and one
of the French frigates was revealed to be close enough to hail the Arrow. Vincent was invited to submit and
come on board the French vessel but he replied with a similar request. The
French now opened fire on both Arrow and
Acheron and it was returned, falling
off however until full daylight would allow more accurate shooting. At seven o’clock
the real action began – one can imagine the preparations on all the ships during
the three or so hours immediately prior to this, and the sense of supressed fear
that must have reigned among the crews.
Opening oaf action: on left Acheron takes on Incorruptible and on right Arrow engages Hortenseby Francis Sartorius Jr. (c) National Maritime Museum; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation |
Both British
and French vessels opened fire almost simultaneously. The Hortense concentrated on the Arrow
while her sister Incorruptible
focussed on the Acheron. The wind was
so light that the vessel had difficulty in manoeuvring but the unequal contest
continued regardless for an hour and twenty minutes. The Arrow sustained massive injury – her masts and rigging badly
damaged, four guns dismounted on her engaged side, her rudder rendered inoperative.
Most serous of all was however that she had taken many hits “between wind and
water” – that is, on her hull below the water line as it was exposed by
rolling. Out of some 132 on board (including several passengers, among them a
lady, her baby and her maid) thirteen men had been killed and twenty-seven
wounded, a casualty rate of 30%. Commander Vincent realised that further
resistance was futile and he struck his colours in surrender. The Arrow was so badly damaged that French
boats were sent across to take off the survivors, her own boats having been badly
damaged. The transfer was just completed when the Arrow rolled over in her beam ends and disappeared.
The Acheron had been in action against the Incorruptible all this time and had
suffered severe damage, but low casualties. She resisted for a quarter hour
longer than Arrow but in the end the Acheron’s Commander Farquhar reluctantly
ordered his colours to be struck as well. She was so badly disabled that the
French set her on fire after her crew had been taken off.
HMS Arrow sinking after surrender, Acheron and Incorruptible still engaging on the right
by Francis Sartorius Jr. (c) National Maritime Museum;
Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation
|
The behaviour
of the French officers and men to their captives offers significant insights to
the state of discipline and morale in Napoleon’s navy at this time. On board the
Hortense the conduct of the officers
was “polite and humane” but they had so little control over their crew that they
were unable to restrain them from pillaging the British prisoners. The treatment
of the prisoners was even worse on the Incorruptible,
the officers themselves “taunting them
with their misfortunes, using very opprobrious terms.”
The sacrifices
of the Arrow and the Acheron brings to mind similarly doomed
resistance by the armed merchant cruisers Rawalpindi
and Jervis Bay in 1939 and 1940 when
they too were faced by overwhelming enemy force while escorting convoys. In all
these cases the “last stands” by the escorts allowed a substantial part of the convoy
to escape. After the Arrow and Acheron action the French frigates captured
only three out of the 34 ships in the convoy. Some of these vessels, now
sailing independently, did however later fall prey to Spanish privateers.
The Acheron’s
crew were taken to Malaga and, as was common at this period, a prisoner-exchange
deal was agreed soon after. Commander Farquhar, his officers, and his crew were
court-martialled on board HMS Royal Sovereign
off Sardinia for the loss of their ship. The court-martial was a formality –
Farquhar was not only acquitted with honour but he was promoted to the coveted
rank of Post Captain. The court-martial president returned Farquhar’s sword
with the words “I hope you will soon be
called upon to meet the Hortense on more equal terms. The result of the contest
may prove more lucrative to you, but it cannot be more honourable” (What a
way with words!)
The Arrow’s crew were taken to Cartagena and
were exchanged some three months later. Their court-martial took place on board
HMS Gladiator in Portsmouth and Commander
Vincent and his men were acquitted with similarly eulogies to those accorded the
Acheron’s crew. Vincent too was
promoted to “post”.
A pleasing
postscript was the two ships’ defence of the convoy was rewarded by commercial organisations.
Swords of Honour were presented to both Vincent and Farquhar by the Lloyds
(Insurance) Patriotic Fund and cash payments were made to wounded, bereaved
families and survivors who had lost all they had when the vessels were destroyed.
Looking back
over two centuries however, the most significant aspect of the action was the
post-victory behaviour of the French crews and the inability of their officers
to control them. It was hard to imagine such men ever prevailing against the discipline
and professionalism of Royal Navy crews. And Trafalgar, only eight months later,
proved that they could not.
I'm busy at present preparing for
the Weymouth Leviathan festival in the coming weekend.I'm particularly looking
forward to the writer's workshop "From Idea to Plot" that I'll be
running from 0900 to 1045 on Saturday 12th. Participants will receive and use a
workbook for developing a plot from one of eight "ideas" for a
historical naval adventure which I'll ask them to choose from. There are a few
places left for this session so if you've ever thought "I've got an idea
for a novel", but have never got further, and are in the South of England
in the coming weekend, you may find it useful to come along. Click here for booking detailsfor this or any one of a myriad number of fascinating events at which well-known names in the factual and fictional nautical writing worlds are appearing.
Great post, Antoine. The British are great at retelling the stories of victories but less likely to present those where the enemy came out on top. No mention was made of the non-compliance of the merchant fleet. I trust a few captains/masters lived out their days with guilty consciences.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this post....an interesting story. I enjoy your writing style.
ReplyDeleteThanks Tom - glad you enjoyed it. I'll keep both blogs and books coming!
Delete