Napoleon III and Eugenie in glory |
I was set off on the train of thinking that led to this
article when driving past a girl’s school some six-miles from my home. As I did
I membered that I was passing the last resting place of the French Emperor
Napoleon III, his Spanish-born Empress Eugenie and his son, Napoleon Eugene,
the Prince Imperial, who was to die, incongruously, in British uniform during
the Zulu War. Exiled after France’s collapse before Prussian professionalism in
the Franco-Prussian War in 1870, Napoleon spent his last days in England. His wife
was to retire to the house that is now the Farnborough Hill School and close by
she built a mausoleum for herself, her husband and her son, whose body she had
travelled to South Africa to recover. She lived on in sad retirement until
1920, the survivor of a bygone age. In an earlier blog of mine (Click here to read it) we met her at the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, the last moment of
her glory before war, death and exile enveloped
her
Napoleon III's dream of military glory. The reality was somewhat different. |
French assets en route to the front |
One of the bloodiest of these wars was fought in 1859 when
Napoleon III decided to commit French power to support the tiny North-Italian
kingdom of Piedmont against the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the Second Italian
War of Independence. Italy as known today did still not exist as a single entity
and major portions of Northern Italy were under Austro-Hungarian rule. Piedmont
aspired – wholly successfully as it later turned out – not only to eject the Austro-Hungarians
but to unite all the other Italian States under a single crown, that of
Piedmont. Small in population and resources compared with the Austro-Hungarian
Empire, tiny Piedmont had little hope of success unless she could secure a powerful ally – which proved to be France.
Napoleon III’s price was to be Piedmont’s handing over of its the provinces of
Savoy and Nice to France. The bargain was a cynical one and because of it large
numbers of innocent men were to die and there would be misery and suffering on
a vast scale.
Once assured of French support Piedmont set out to provoke the
Austro-Hungarians, less by issuing predicable demands than be mobilising its
troops. The Austrians sent an ultimatum demanding immediate demobilisation
while the French Ambassador in Vienna told them that any move against Piedmont
wold be considered a declaration of war on France. (The similarities with 1914
need no stressing). On 27th April 1859 the Austrians crossed the Piedmontese
frontier and were then at war with both France and Piedmont.
Eager to earn military laurels in imitation of his uncle,
Napoleon I, the French Emperor took personal command of the his army. It was at
this time a respected fighting force – it had performed well in the Crimea five
years before and many of its officers and men had also been hardened by
fighting in Algeria. The army the French sent into Northern Italy was upwards
of 100,000 men and the Piedmontese added another 40,000 to this. Faced by a 130,000
Austrian troops, the stage was set for the largest battle on European soil
since the Napoleonic Wars.
Battle of Magenta - French troops pushing back Austrian "White Coats" |
Pushing eastwards towards Milan from the Piedmontese capital
of Turin, the combined French-Piedmontese force crashed into the Austrians at the
village of Magenta on June 4th. The fighting was savage as the area
was well suited to defence, a landscape of orchards seamed with streams and
canals. The Austrians turned every house into a miniature fortress that must be
taken by storm. Dogged though the defence was, the Austrians were forced back
with dead, wounded and captured reaching some 10,000.The French victory was to
be marked by a newly discovered aniline dye being called after it.
Emperor Franz Josef |
Elated by success the French-Piedmontese juggernaut rolled
on eastwards. Three weeks later, on June
24th, it ran into four Austrian Armies, a total of 130,000 men,
under the titular command of the 29-year old Emperor Franz-Josef, east of Milan
and directly south of Lake Garda. The
Austrians had entrenched themselves, or had occupied strong-points, on a ten-mile north south front and, once
again, much of the fighting was to involve hand-to hand-storming of defended positions.
The battle was to be the last at which two reigning monarchs were present.
The
French-Piedmontese attacks were launched at dawn and fighting was to continue for
some fifteen hours. The sheer size of the battlefield, and the number of men
involved, made coordination very difficult, especially on the
French-Piedmontese side. The conflict therefore descended into three
all-but-separate battles in flat farmland. In the north the Austrians, with the
lake on their right flank, though outnumbered, resisted Piedmontese attacks
successfully and retired in good order. The village of Solferino, in the centre,
held out for most of the day but the French finally punched through in early
evening. At the southern extremity, where the French were outnumbered, the Austrians
held out successfully, counterattacking when appropriate, but, as at the northern
end, it was necessary to fall back once the centre had been breached. They withdrew
to the fortified area known as “The Quadrilateral” and were not followed – the war
was essentially at an end.
French attack at Solferino village - the decisive point |
The losses were horrendous – over 2300 French and Piedmontese killed, over
12000 wounded and a further 2700 missing. – a 12% casualty rate. The
corresponding figures for the Austrians were over 2300 killed, over 10,000
wounded and over 9000 missing – 17% of the men involved. The fighting was a merciless
as is usually the case in close action and many wounded men on both sides were
shot or bayoneted.
Solferino - the bloody aftermath |
The suffering of the dead was over, but that of those
surviving was immeasurable given the inadequate ambulance and medical services and
the fact that battlefield surgery was performed without anaesthetics. Napoleon
III was himself horrified and kept repeating “The poor fellows. The poor fellows. What a terrible thing was is!” Though
this realisation that did not deter him from launching further wars in the future,
he was sufficiently moved on this occasion to meet Emperor Franz Josef some
days later and to make a separate peace with him.
Henri Dunant |
Though Nice and Savoy – Napoleon III’s price – remain French
today (Mussolini got them back briefly for Italy in WW2), the most significant long term consequence
of the battle was the most unexpected. A Swiss businessman, Henri Dunant (1828-1910), who
had encountered problems with the French authorities in Algeria about interests
he had there, had sought out Napoleon in Northern Italy to seek his assistance.
The result was that Dunant saw the appalling aftermath of Solferino, although
he did not witness the battle himself. Shocked to the core by the carnage, but
determined to do something to help, Dunant enlisted the local civilians,
including women, to assist the wounded. Short as they were of the necessary
resources, Dunant organised purchase of supplies and set up makeshift
hospitals. He negotiated with the French to get captured Austrian doctors released
and, without reference to difference in nationality, managed the initiative
under the slogan "Tutti
fratelli" (“All men are brothers”).
Dunant subsequently described his experiences in a book entitled
Un Souvenir de Solferino (A Memory of
Solferino), published in 1862. It not only described the battle and its
aftermath but also the idea of a neutral organisation dedicated to caring for wounded, regardless of
nationality. He sent the book to many leading political and military figures in
Europe. Support for such his ideas came first in Switzerland and the Geneva
Society for Public Welfare took practical steps to establish what was to be the
International Committee of the Red Cross. The symbol chosen was the reverse of
the Swiss flag – a white cross on a red ground – and its simplicity, like its future
Red Crescent counterpart in Muslim countries, made it an easy one to recognise
even under battle conditions. The rest is history and Dunant’s legacy – and reputation
– has outlasted that of the emperors whose ambitions prompted his actions.
Dunant in old age |
Much of Dunant’s later life was unhappy. His business efforts
did not prosper and he drifted away from the organisation he had inspired. He descended into poverty and
was dependent on friends in later years. It was only towards the end of his
life that his personal achievement was fully recognised and in 1901 he was the joint
recipient of the first Nobel Peace Prize. Dying nine years later, after suffering
years of depression, his last words were "Where
has humanity gone?"
Napoleon III lies forgotten in a mausoleum in Hampshire and Franz
Josef was to remain on the Austro-Hungarian throne until 1916, leaving his
empire plunged in a war that would destroy it two years after his death. But Henri Dunant’s legacy lives on. His was a
life to be more proud of than of either.
Download a free copy of Britannia’s Eventide by clicking the cover image below
To thank subscribers to the Dawlish Chronicles mailing list, a free, downloadable, copy of a new short story, Britannia's Eventide has been sent to them as an e-mail attachment.
If you have not already subscribed to the mailing list, you can do so by clicking here or on the image above. You will then receive a copy of the story by e-mail.
I must have driven close to that mausoleum many times, and until today had no idea that it contained Napoleon III and family !
ReplyDeleteIt's teh last thing you'd expect! But as Farnborough was the centre of British aviation development during the last years of Eugenie's life she would frequently have seen aircraft overhead. What a difference to the world she had known during the Second Empire!
ReplyDeleteWarfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
ReplyDeleteYour article is very well done, a good read.
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
ReplyDeleteYour article is very well done, a good read.