A contemporary satirical print showing Byng and the inconclusive action that doomed him |
The execution by firing squad in 1757 of Admiral George Byng
(1704-1757) on the quarterdeck of HMS Monarch
in 1757 is perhaps best remembered by Voltaire’s verdict in his novel Candide: “In this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in
order to encourage the others." Byng had been court-martialled for failure
to relieve the besieged British garrison in Minorca in the Western
Mediterranean the previous year. The key element in the charge was that he “had not done his utmost against the enemy
in battle or pursuit”, as required by the “Articles of War” that governed
the Royal Navy. A death sentence was mandatory for conviction on this charge.
Byng’s squadron was seriously undermanned and ill-prepared for the latest conflict
with France – later to be known as the Seven Years War. One of the French
opening moves was to land 15,000 men on the island and lay siege to the British
base there. Byng’s force, sent to succour the besieged garrison, did indeed
engage the enemy in the inconclusive naval Battle of Minorca in May 1756 and,
following a council with his senior officers thereafter, he decided that
Minorca was beyond saving from the French. Byng brought his ships back to
Gibraltar for refitting and the Minorca garrison was obliged to surrender to the
French, thereby depriving Britain of a vital strategic resource. Recalled to
Britain, Byng’s disgrace, court-martial and execution followed.
Though the full responsibility for the disaster had been
laid on Byng, a degree of opprobrium also attached itself to his captains.
Among these was Captain Arthur Gardiner, who had been Byng’s flag-captain, an
honourable man who felt that his own honour had been compromised. He appears to have been especially hurt by a
remark by the First Lord of the Admiralty, the formidable Lord Anson, which he
reported to his friends and was to the effect that “he was one of the men who had brought disgrace on the nation.” For
a man like Gardiner it was essential to demonstrate, at whatever cost to
himself, that he was not the man Anson had judged him to be.
A French "64" of the period - Monmouth would have looked generally similar (Attribution: Wikipedia Commons and www.musee-marine.fr Authority control VIAF: 19144648200974718522 Museofile: M5026 Accession number 3 OA 10) |
Soon after Byng’s death Gardiner was sent back to the
Mediterranean in command of the 64-gun HMS Monmouth,
as part of Admiral Henry Osborne’s squadron. In early 1758 this force had
succeeded in driving a French fleet of fifteen ships into the Spanish port of
Cartagena and keeping them blockaded there. This fleet had been en-route to Louisbourg,
the great French fortress on Cape Breton Island, with reinforcements. On
February 28th a French relieving force of three ships-of- the-line, carrying
the Governor of “New France” (French Canada) and under the naval command of Admiral
Gallifoniere. This officer also spotted the British force, and realising that
it was larger, decided to retreat. Osborne responded by ordering a general
chase, directing Gardiner in Monmouth,
and two other ships, the Hampton Court
and the Swiftsure, to engage Gallifoniere’s
flagship, the Foudroyant. The latter
was one of the most powerful vessels afloat, her eighty guns consisting of
thirty 42-pounders – enormous weapons for the time – as well as thirty-two
24-pounders and eighteen 12-pounders. With a crew of 470, a French privateer
previously captured by the Monmouth
had said of the Foudroyant that “She would fight today, tomorrow, and the
next day, but could never be taken.” By contrast, the Monmouth was armed with sixty-four 24-pounders and had a crew of
470 and her two consorts were almost identically armed. Together, these three
ships might have been enough to defeat the more powerful French vessel, but any
one of them alone would be heavily outgunned.
An accident of fate had provided Gardiner with the
opportunity he craved to wipe out the stain on his honour. As the Monmouth, faster-sailing than Hampton Court or Swiftsure, closed with Foudroyant
it was revealed that she was flying the flag of the Admiral Gallifoniere, the
commander who had been present on board her during the action with Byng. Eager
now for action, Gardiner pressed on with Monmouth,
determined to engage the Foudroyant
at any cost and unwilling to wait for the other British ships to catch up.
According to one account he pointed to Foudroyant
and told an army-officer on board “Whatever
becomes of you and me, that ship must go into Gibraltar.”
By the time Monmouth
opened fire on Foudroyant, both Hampton Court and Swiftsure were out of sight and Gardiner was committed to a one-to-one
duel. He was wounded in the arm almost immediately, but not badly enough to incapacitate
him. Monmouth’s opening fire damaged the
Foudroyant’s rigging, thereby lessening
her manoeuvrability, and Gardiner placed his ship off the enemy’s quarter. From
this position Monmouth pounded
Foudroyant for almost two hours while being exposed to less fire herself (As so
often when learning of such actions, one Is struck by the duration of such
cannonades – one can only assume that sheer exhaustion of the gun crews would
have lessened the rate of fire considerably). Gardiner, directing operations from
the open deck, now received his second, and ultimately fatal, wound, a blow from
a ball or fragment on his forehead. Before he passed out and was carried below
to the surgeon he called for his first lieutenant – Robert Carkett (approx.
1720 – 1780) – and asked him not to give up the ship or halt the action.
Carkett responded by having the colours nailed to the mast and with a pistol in
each hand swore that he would shoot anybody who would attempt to strike them.
Monmouth’s mizzen
mast now collapsed but shortly after the corresponding mast on Foudroyant also came down, followed soon
afterwards by the main mast. Now crippled, the French ship was subjected to no
less than four hours of fire from Monmouth,
which still had some ability to manoeuvre. This lasted through the evening and
into darkness and when Swiftsure
arrived on the scene around midnight, to add her fire to Monmouth’s, Foudroyant
surrendered. Consistent with the chivalry of the period, the French captain recognised
Carkett’s courage by insisting on handing his sword to him, rather than to the
more senior officer commanding Swiftsure.
An engraving of Swaine's picture. Such engravings were very popular and some original ones can still be found in English country public houses |
Captain Gardiner died the following day but his aspiration
to have Foudroyant brought into
Gibraltar was realised. Lieutenant Carkett was appointed to command her “as a reward for his conduct and an
encouragement for future emulation” and was further rewarded by promotion
to post captain, the coveted goal of every ambitious officer. It was especially
valuable as he had originally entered the navy as a common seaman and had risen
by his own exertions. This was however his last promotion and he was still a
captain in 1780 when he was accused – unfairly – of failure to obey signals
during the Battle of Martinique. Tragically, he did not live to clear his name
as his ship, the Stirling Castle, was
wrecked in a hurricane There was only a handful of survivors and Carkett was
not among them.
The “butcher’s bill“ for the Monmouth vs. Foudroyant
action was decidedly one-sided, reflecting Monmouth’s
ability to retain manoeuvrability while her opponent was immobilised. She suffered
27 killed and 79 wounded (a not-inconsiderable loss rate of 23%) while the more
powerful Foudroyant had 190 killed and wounded (40%). Gardiner’s grim determination
to ignore the disparity in armament had paid off, though it cost him his own
life.
It is probable that he found the price an acceptable one for
redemption of his name and honour.
Download a free copy of Britannia’s Eventide by clicking the cover image below
To thank subscribers to the Dawlish Chronicles mailing list, a free, downloadable, copy of a new short story, Britannia's Eventide has been sent to them as an e-mail attachment.
I hope Gardiner's crew were equally keen to risk their lives as he was to retore his honour and reputation.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to imagine they had much say in the matter. That said, determined captains with a good record could inspire incredible feats in order to secure "the prize", the paying out of which could buy a seaman a secure retirement.
DeleteArmament for Monmouth is incorrect. She carried a mix of 24-pdrs and 12-pdrs, not all 24-pdrs.
ReplyDeleteThanks Michael - I was guided by Giffard on this. It's indeed all the more impressive that Monmouth was so successful.
DeleteYou might also mention that Monmouth was an immensely old vessel, having been rebuilt several times since the 1660s.
ReplyDeleteAgree - the taxpayer certainly got value for money. One wonders however how much of the original structure remained at the end. One hears possibly apocryphal stories of decades-old aircraft on which the only original component is the nameplate.
DeleteWho was Caret?
ReplyDeleteThanks for spotting the typo, Daniel - it should have red Carkett
Delete