British ships (right) and French ships (left) move up the Parana river towards Argentinian defences, November 20th 1845 |
Today, when one thinks of naval combat between British and
Argentinian forces the Falklands War of 1982 is the case most likely to come to
mind. An equally fierce engagement did however occur 137 years earlier and, though
it is largely forgotten in Britain today, is commemorated annually in Argentina
by a national holiday on each 20th November.
Juan Manuel de Rosas |
The Spanish colonies in South America gained their
independence in the 1820s through brutal wars of liberation. Much of the rest
of the century thereafter was to be occupied by an almost constant warfare
between the new nations – and with the Portuguese-speaking Empire of Brazil –
to establish national boundaries. Dictators were to abound in this period, many
as savage and ruthless as those who were to be seen in Europe and Africa in the
20th Century. Among the most notable – indeed notorious – of these
was the tyrant Juan Manuel de Rosas (1793 –1877) ruled Argentina almost
uninterruptedly from 1829 to 1852. His government was one of terror, with
savage suppression of opposition by a state police called the Mazorca. Wars with neighbouring states, as well as
civil conflict, marked his rule and were barbarous in the extreme – according
to one source “prisoners were rarely
taken or, if taken, were then killed; fugitives were hunted down, their throats
cut, their heads exhibited."
The political complexities surrounding war between Argentina
and Uruguay in the mid-1840s are impossible to sketch in a short article.
British and French interest in the situation focussed on protection of commercial
interests in Uruguay and on keeping navigation of the Parana River open to commercial
traffic. This huge river, navigable by sea-going vessels of the time for much
of its length, leads into the very heart of South America.
View of the boom from the Argentinian batteries on the cliff south of the river |
In mid-1845 Argentina had closed the river by means of a
boom and shore batteries at La Vuelta de Obligado, some 120 mile NNW of Buenos
Aires. At this point the river is 700 metres wide and a tight turn (vuelta in Spanish) makes navigation
difficult. British merchant shipping was trapped upstream and other ships, 92
in total, carrying manufactured goods, were unable to move upstream. At this
period of British commercial dominance the challenge was irresistible, as it also
was for the French.
The Argentine boom extended completely across the river and consisted
of 24 vessels linked by three strong metal chains. Only three of these vessels were
Argentinian naval units and the remainder were requisitioned. Four artillery
batteries with 30 cannons in total, a mix of 8, 10, 12 and 20-pounders, were
dug in on a cliff that rose from 100 to 600 feet on the southern bank, and supported
by some 2,000 entrenched troops. A small brigantine, the Republicano, and two small gunboats, the Restaurador and the Lagos,
were also available to protect the boom.
The combined British-French force that moved upriver totalled
eleven warships, six of them of the Royal Navy. Eight of the vessels were
sailing craft but the most powerful were three steam paddlers: HMS Gorgon, HMS Firebrand and the French Fulton.
Steam power in warfare still a novelty and these vessels represented contemporary
cutting-edge technology.
HMS Gorgon - by Sir Oswald Walters Brierly |
The Gorgon, which
had already seen action in the bombardment of Acre in 1840, can be considered representative
of the type. Of wooden construction and of 1,610 tons, she was classed as a
sloop. Her length was 152 feet along the keel and her 800 hp 2-cylinder
direct-acting steam engine drove two enormous 27 foot diameter paddle wheels – and
obvious point of vulnerability in battle. Though capable of 9.5 knots under
steam considerations of coal supply demanded that she also carry an auxiliary sailing
rig. Her armament was impressive for her size – two pivot-mounted 10-inch guns,
two 68-pounders and two 42-pounder carronades. In addition the British ships
carried Congreave rockets, probably 24-pounders, which, due to their high
trajectories, were to prove very useful for attacking the Argentinian positions
on the cliffs.
The Argentinian batteries under rocket bombardment |
British and French ships approach the boom (on the right) |
The battle commenced early on November 20th, with
an intense bombardment by the British and French ships of the outgunned Argentinian
defences. The wind was light, making
handling of the British and French sailing vessels difficult and they were to
suffer under fire of the batteries. The three steamers now came into their own,
not only since they were heavily armed, but because of their manoeuvrability and non-dependence on
wind. Heavy casualties — 150 dead, 90 wounded – were inflicted on the Argentinian
defenders. The boom remained however intact and heavily defended, and gunfire
alone was unlikely to part the chains linking the vessels it consisted of.
Boarding the boom - a heavily romanticised contemporary view The boom is shown as consisting of ships - in fact there were three only and the remaining vessels were barges |
What followed had much about it of a “cutting out”
expedition of the Nelsonian and Napoleonic period. Captain James Hope of HMS Firebrand volunteered to cut the boom.
Taking three boats with him, and under heavy fire, he managed to board at the centre
of the boom. Armourers accompanied the bluejackets and in some four minutes the
chains had been severed, allowing the allied ships to push upriver. They were
now in a position to rake the shore batteries with impunity. Disembarked troops
overcame the last defenders of the bluff, and 21 cannons were captured. The
Argentinian Republicano was blown up by her
own commander when he was unable to defend it any longer but the gunboats Restaurador and Lagos disengaged successfully and withdrew up river. The combined British
and French force had lost 28 dead and 95 wounded.
Sulivan as admiral |
The river was now open to commercial traffic, its safety
guaranteed by the allied ships. One of the British vessels, the brig HMS Philomel, advanced to a point 800 miles
from the sea, under the command of Commander Bartholomew Sulivan. The voyage was
a triumph of skilful seamanship, progress hampered at times by contrary winds, a
three or four knot current, and shallow sections with as little as a foot of water
beneath the keel. Sulivan, who had served on HMS Beagle during her momentous
voyage, was subsequently to emerge as the Royal Navy’s most noted hydrographer and
to end his career as an admiral. Captain Hope also achieved flag rank, his
promotions culminating in Admiral of the Fleet in 1879.
The Obligado victory did not however end the British and French
confrontation with Argentina. A five-year long blockade was to close Buenos
Aires to maritime commerce. The stand-off was ended by treaties signed in 1849
by Britain and in 1850 by France and acknowledging the Argentine sovereignty
over its rivers.
The Battle of Obligado has achieved iconic status in
Argentinian memory as an instance of preservation of national sovereignty and of
resistance to foreign intervention. It is commemorated not just by the annual 20th
November holiday but by a memorial park at the site of the battle at which the remnants of the boom chains figure prominently
The French took particular pride in their contribution and a
Paris Métro station remained named after the battle until 1947. When Eva Perón came to visit the name was
however judged undiplomatic and the station was renamed “Argentine” and has remained so since!
And what became of the dictator, Rosas? He was to rule Argentina
for another seven years, finally fleeing into exile after defeat in a war with
Brazil. He settled – surprisingly – in England, and appears to have lived
quietly thereafter, dying at Southampton in 1877.
Dictators have met worse fates.
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
ReplyDeleteYour article is very well done, a good read.
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
ReplyDeleteYour article is very well done, a good read.