At the start of World War I the major navies had significant
numbers of pre-dreadnought battleships which, though in many cases only eight
or ten years old, had been rendered wholly obsolete by the commissioning of HMS
Dreadnought in 1905. This, the first
turbine-driven, all-big gun, battleship, mounted ten 12” guns, compared with
the almost universal armament of four 12-inch guns for the average pre-dreadnought,
and set the model for all subsequent capital ships. By the outbreak of war in
1914 large numbers of “dreadnoughts” – the name had already come to symbolise a
type – were in service in the larger navies. Putting obsolete pre-dreadnoughts
into a battle-line which would have to face much more powerfully-armed
dreadnoughts was likely to be little
short of suicidal.
|
HMS Canopus - typical pre-dreadnought, sister of HMS Goliath |
In 1914 the Royal Navy still has 39 pre-dreadnoughts while
the French Navy had 26 (including several more heavily-armed
“semi-dreadnoughts”). It was recognised that though they were unsuited to
battle-fleet service they might still prove of value in secondary duties such
as shore bombardment. In such cases low speed would be less of a concern and
each ship would be capable of bringing four 12” weapons into play, plus large
numbers of lower-calibre weapons.
It was the availability of large numbers of such
pre-dreadnoughts that contributed to the decision to attempt forcing a passage
through the Turkish-held Dardanelles Strait in 1915. Success in establishing a
sea-route to the Russian Black Sea coast would allow supply of weapons and
munitions to often-underequipped Russian land forces. Some have indeed argued that had this been achieved Russia might not have collapsed as it did in
1916/17 and that the Bolshevik Revolution might not have occurred. There also appears to have been some thinking that,
in view of the large number of obsolete pre-dreadnoughts available, significant
losses could be tolerated to achieve success. This argument ignored the fact
that these ships carried large crews, and that the sinking of any one would
mean a devastatingly high – and unacceptable – death-toll.
|
The Bouvet in peacetime livery, black hull, light grey upperworks |
The purely naval attempt to force the Dardanelles on 18
th
March 1915 saw no less than sixteen British and French pre-dreadnoughts, plus
the new 15” dreadnought
Queen Elizabeth
and the lightly armoured battle-cruiser
Inflexible,
advance up a strait that narrowed from four miles to one in some ten miles. The
result was a disaster. Under fire from Turkish shore-batteries, and heading
into upswept minefields, two British pre-dreadnoughts (
Ocean and
Irresistible)
and one French one (
Bouvet) were lost
in little more than an hour. The
Inflexible – which should not have been
there, as speed rather than armour was intended as her protection – survived
after hitting a mine. The loss of the
Bouvet
was particularly spectacular, blowing up and sinking in less than two minutes
and taking 660 men with her. The impracticability of the scheme was finally
realised and the massive naval force was withdrawn. The decision was now taken
to land troops to capture the Gallipoli Peninsula that flanked the Dardanelles
and poorly-planned and inadequately-supplied landings were made at several
points on April 25
th 1916. None of the forces landed reached their
first-day objectives. The Turks managed to hold, to flood in reinforcements and
to establish a trench-deadlock no less intractable than that on the Western
Front. The eight-month agony of the Gallipoli campaign had begun, ending only
with full evacuation of Allied forces in early 1916.
|
Shore bombardment by HMS Cornwallis (Australian War Museum Photograph AWM H10388) |
The role of the pre-dreadnoughts after the failure of March
18
th was to be shore-bombardment in support of the landings, and
thereafter of the forces onshore.
Over-optimistic assumptions were made about the ability of naval guns to
take-out pin-point targets – which was what the troops onshore needed – and the
results were wholly incommensurate with the risks run by the ships involved.
Three further British pre-dreadnoughts were to be lost before the decision was
taken to withdraw them from the beaches. The ability of the enemy to strike
back with either surface or submarine forces was wholly under-estimated, and
indeed the arrival of a German U-Boat, the U-21, came as a very unpleasant
surprise. HMS
Triumph and HMS
Majestic were
to fall victims to her torpedoes on May 25
th and May 27
th
respectively.
(See blog of 20.01.15 about U21).
The first of the losses off the Gallipoli beaches was
however due to surface attack. Ever since the automotive torpedo had come into
service in the late 1870s the possibility of torpedo-craft penetrating
anchorages under cover of night was recognised as a major threat. The
Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 had indeed begun with exactly such an attack by
the Japanese even before war was declared. It is therefore surprising that lack
of alertness – perhaps even complacency – may have characterised the sinking of
the pre-dreadnought HMS Goliath in
the early hours of May 13th 1915.
|
HMS Goliath |
Of the
Canopus
class, the
Goliath was a typical pre-dreadnought.
Completed in 1900, of 13,000 tons and 430-feet long, she carried four 12-inch
guns, twelve 6-inch and a large number of smaller weapons. She had served off the East African coast
earlier in the war but was recalled to participate in the attempt on the
Dardanelles. Her crew was over 700. She had provided fire-support for the
landings on April 25
th and continued to do so thereafter, sustaining
light damage from Turkish shore batteries.
On the night of 12
th-13
th May she was anchored in Morto
Bay, close to Cape Helles, the southern tip of the Gallipoli Peninsula, in
company with a similar vessel, HMS
Cornwallis.
Five destroyers had been assigned to protect them and visibility was low due to
fog.
|
Muavenet-i Milliye on Turkish postcard |
Following a period of stagnation, under-investment and a
lack-lustre performance in the Balkan Wars 1912-13
(see blog of 04.04.14 re The Battle of Elli) the
Turkish Navy was in the process of re-equipping in 1914. Britain’s refusal to
deliver two dreadnoughts constructed in British yards and already paid for (and
taken into British service as HMS
Agincourt
and HMS
Erin) was a contributing factor
in Turkey entering WW1 on the German side. Delivery had been taken of other new
vessels however, most notably four modern torpedo-boats built by Germany’s
Schichau-Werft company . These had originally been ordered for the Imperial
German Navy but in 1910 they were sold, before completion, to Turkey. They were
impressive vessels, designed only for one purpose, that of attack. Of 765 tons and 243-feet long, their two
turbines delivering 17,700 HP, and 26 knots, they carried three 18-inch torpedo
tubes as well as two 3-inch and two 2.25-inch guns. It was one of these
vessels, the
Muâvenet-i Millîye (
National Support) that was to be the
Goliath’s nemesis.
|
Ohlay (Right) & Firle (left) |
Though the
Muâvenet-i Millîye was commanded by
Senior Lieutenant Ahmet Saffet Ohkay , a German officer, Lieutenant Rudolph
Firle, one of many seconded to the Turkish Navy, was assigned to the vessel to
give specialist advice on torpedo attack. Taking advantage of darkness and fog patches
the torpedo boat passed through the Turkish minefields in early evening and
then anchored under cover of the Turkish-held Gallipoli shore about seven miles
north-east of the anchored pre-dreadnoughts. She remained there until shortly
after midnight and in the meantime, around 23.30, the searchlights sweeping the
anchorage from the British ships were switched off. (Why this was done is one
of the mysteries of the entire operation).
The
Muâvenet-i-Millîye now crept down along
the shore and the Allied destroyers failed to detect her. Only at 0100 hrs were
two of these destroyers, HMS
Beagle
and HMS
Bulldog, sighted – but astern
– and
Goliath was spotted directly
ahead. The Turkish vessel’s advance was
now noticed and
Goliath signalled a
request for the night’s password. It was too late. The
Muâvenet-i-Millîye was in torpedo-range and she launched three
torpedoes. They proved to be equally
spaced along the pre-dreadnought’s length – one hit below the bridge, a second
below the funnels and the third near the stern. The Goliath capsized and sank
almost immediately, so quickly in fact that 570 of her crew of more than 700 were
lost, including the captain. The darkness and the fast current running – up to
three knots – hampered rescue efforts significantly.
|
Turkish painting of the attack by Diyarbakirli Tahsin
(Turkish Naval Museum, Istanbul) |
In the
confusion following the attack the
Muâvenet-i-Millîye
escaped back safely up the Dardanelles. She returned to a hero’s welcome in
Istanbul, with illuminations along the Bosporus in honour of her and her crew,
and with the award of medals and decorations. Perhaps the best tribute paid to
her and her crew came from General Sir Ian Hamilton, the British Army commander
at Gallipoli, who wrote in his diary – “The Turks deserve a medal."
|
Triumphant torpedo-crew: Firle is second from right in front of tube |
The
Goliath’s loss was to have serious
consequences within the British Government, leading in turn to the immediate
resignation of the First Sea Lord Admiral Fisher (who had conceived the
Dreadnought and presided over the Royal Navy’s modernisation) and, shortly
later, that of the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill. Two more
pre-dreadnoughts,
Triumph and
Majestic, were to be sunk by the
U-21 in the next
fortnight, triggering the decision to withdraw all heavy units. The long,
painful journey to final defeat and evacuation was now well advanced.
And the Muavenet-i -Milliye? She was to have an
inglorious post-war career as an accommodation hulk until she was scrapped in
1953.
But in her
one night of glory she had changed history.
-----------------
If you want
to read about service in the Turkish Navy in an earlier war, click on image
below for more details and to read the opening:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteYour Chronicles are a feast to read! As a child I liked to wander off into distant worlds reading ao. the books of Jules Verne so this timeframe is just up my alley! The 19th- and early 2oth century and the ocean are indeed fascinating subjects.
ReplyDeleteI have just one complaint: why did you write so many! To choose from is mind boggling!
Michiel
Michiel
I'm glad that you liked the article and the books Michiel - and the seventh novel is now in preparation. I hope you'll like that also! Antoine
Delete