The Crimean War (1854-56) in which Britain, France, Turkey
and Piedmont took on Russia is generally thought of in terms of the operations
in the Crimea itself. Most notable of these were the Siege of Sevastopol and
battles in its immediate support such as Balaclava, Inkermann and the stormings
of the Malakoff Redoubt and the Redan. Operations did however take place in other
theatres, most notably the Baltic, Eastern Anatolia and the Russian Pacific
Coast (See Blog of March 27th 2015). Prior to the
landing of the large Allied invasion force in the Crimea in September 1854 there
was however an earlier – and significant – naval action. This was the bombardment
of the Russian Black Sea port of Odessa in April 1854. It was carried out by a
combined British-French force and though it initially had a superficial quality
of “an affair of honour” it was to
have powerful strategic implications.
HMS Furious |
Though hostilities between Russia and Ottoman Turkey had
commenced in 1853 it was not until March 28th 1854 that Britain and France
declared war on Russia and that planning for offensive operations, including
landings in Russian territory, commenced. Normal protocol called for safe repatriation
of diplomatic and consular staff from all combatant nations. As part of this
process the Royal Navy paddle-frigate HMS Furious
arrived at Odessa to bring off the British consul. She anchored outside the harbour
with a flag of truce at her mast-head and sent in a boat, also with a flag of
truce flying. As the boat left with the consul, both it and Furious were fired upon by a Russian
shore-battery, happily without inflicting damage.
HMS Furious - and her boat - under Russian fire despite white flag of truce |
Outrage was predictable, felt not least by Admiral Sir James
Dundas (1785 –1862), Royal Navy Commander-in-Chief in the Mediterranean since
1852 and a veteran of the Napoleonic Wars. He ensured that a combined Anglo-French
squadron was hastily assembled and he addressed a note to Odessa’s Russian
governor, General Osten-Sacken, demanding “that
all the British, French, and Russian vessels now at anchor near the citadel or
the batteries of Odessa be forthwith delivered up to the combined squadron; and
that if at sunset no answer or a negative be received, they will be compelled
by force to avenge the insult offered, though, for humanity’s sake, they adopt
the alternative with regret, and cast the responsibility of the act upon those
to whom it belongs.” No satisfactory reply was received and action was now
inevitable.
French illustration of bombardment - note main squadron not engaged and in line-ahead offshore Bombarding force shown directly north of town. "Imperial Mole" jutting out to north. |
The British-French squadron arrived off Odessa on April 22nd
and its composition was a clear indication that the Age of Fighting Sail was
well past. The numerically largest
component was a total of eighteen wooden line-of battle ships, of which twelve
were British (including the embarrassingly-named HMS Trafalgar). These were however kept offshore out of shore-battery
range – the Russian destruction of the Ottoman Turkish felt at Sinope the previous
year had shown just how vulnerable wooden ships were to modern shell-fire. The
responsibility for bombardment of Odessa was therefore allocated to smaller, and
more maneuverable, vessels, all of which, other than a single British sailing
frigate, HMS Arethusa, had steam
power as either their primary means of propulsion. The French contributed four steam paddle-frigates,
the Descartes, Caton, Mogador and Vauban, and the British five generally
similar vessels, Furious, Retribution, Sampson, Terrible and Tiger. The later may be regarded as
representative of these vessels – of 1300 tons and 206 feet long she carried fourteen
32-pounder guns along her flanks, plus two 10-inch on deck-mounted pivots. 400-hp
engine power drove her twin paddlewheels and these, by their size and location,
represented her greatest vulnerability. It is notable that the bombardment
force also included six ship's boats armed with 24-pounder rockets, a 19th-century
version of modern missile-craft. Also
present was the 21-gun screw-frigate Highflyer,
and the 70-gun steam ship Sans Pareil.
The Sans Pareil represented
a “last gasp” of the wooden ship-of-the line. She had been laid down in 1845 as
an 80-gun “second rate”, a sailing vessel generally similar to the first HMS Sans
Pareil, which had been captured from the French a half-century previously. While
still on the stocks she was recognised as an anachronism and work on her in
this form was suspended in 1848. She was modified thereafter to employ steam
propulsion – a 622-hp engine driving a single screw and giving a speed of 7
knots. The steam plant resulted in a reduction of the number of guns to 70, all
32-pounders and her sailing rig was maintained. Of 3,800 tons and 200 feet long,
only the presence of her smoke-stack made her look any different to a vessel of
the Nelsonic era.
Contemporary depiction of the bombardment - note close range involved. Note also boat in foreground with launching tube for 24" rocket in the bows |
The bombardment commenced at dawn on April 22nd
with Descartes, Sampson, Tiger and Vauban opening fire on the Russian
positions at a range of 2,000 yards. In an echo of an earlier age Vauban was hit by heated shot which
started a fire aboard and caused her to drop out of line. Furious, Retribution, Terrible and Mogador then joined the attack, while Arethusa, Highflyer and Sans Pareil stood in reserve further out.
Terrible scored the most notable
triumph of the bombardment, a hit on a magazine on the Imperial Mole which caused
a spectacular explosion. The action continued for ten hours, during which some 24
Russian ships in the port were set on fire and several interned British and
French merchantmen took advantage of the confusion to escape. The rocket boats were
meanwhile dedicated to initiating conflagrations in the dockyard storehouses. During
the afternoon the Arethusa also came
inshore to engage shore batteries. By the time the action was broken off at
1730 hrs much of the town and port facilities were on fire. Odessa had been essentially
eliminated as an operational Russian base and was to remain so for the rest of the
war.
The explosion of the magazine on the Imperial Mole |
Some bitter satisfaction – albeit a minor one – was however
to be accorded to the Russians. An Allied naval presence was maintained off the
port and on May 12th, during a thick fog, HMS Tiger ran on to rocks five miles south-west of Odessa. Her guns were dropped overboard to lighten her
and her boats dropped anchors to allow her to warp herself off, though to no
avail. She then came under fire from Russian field artillery that had arrived
on the cliffs above. Burning, and with her captain and others severely wounded,
there was no option but to strike her colours. Her engines were later recovered
by the Russians and installed in the imperial yacht, appropriately names “Tigr.” HMS Tiger’s Captain Giffard, who had lost a leg, died of gangrene three
weeks later and was buried at Odessa with full military honours. Four others
also died of wounds.
Admiral Dundas |
The attack on Odessa is one of the few occasions when a
naval bombardment of shore defences proved successful in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries – indeed Nelson himself had warned that “A ship’s a fool to fight a fort”.
Boldness alone did not account for the success, and due account must be taken
of maneuverability of steam-propelled craft and the protection this gave when
they came under fire from shore. Credit is also due to Dundas for his decision
to keep his larger – and more vulnerable – ships out of the fray. Otherwise
undistinguished as a senior commander, his neutralisation of Odessa was to be
critical in allowing the subsequent invasion of the Crimea and the uninterrupted
supply of the forces landed there.
If you’re interested in naval adventure in the late 19th
Century you may enjoy Britannia’s Shark.
Click on the image below to learn more, and to read the opening by the “Look
Inside” feature.
No comments:
Post a Comment